Word Doesn't Superscript Like The Killian Memos

Just a note: I'm using my copy of Word to reproduce the May 4 memo that orders Lt. Bush to take his physical in May.

I've having a devil of a time persuading Word to not superscript the top "th" in 111th, and also the "st" in 1st Lt. Bush. Those superscripts are also different from the memo's superscript - they remain below the top of the other letters, but the memo's superscript goes above the line.

And the Word superscripting is not a single "th" key - it's both letters in a smaller typeset that's aligned against the top letter. There's no simple way I can see to raise those letters above the top line of the other letters. You can actually delete those small letters one by one and then type whatever you want in that smaller font.

So if this document is a forgery, the forger would have to self correct the top "th" and the "st", and then find a way to defeat the programming to get the second "th" above the other letters.

So it's far more likely that this was typed on a sophisticated typewriter of the time.

Krugman: Bush's Plan To Cut Deficit Assumes Bush Tax Cuts Expire

The New York Times: The Dishonesty Thing

The administration claims to have a plan to cut the deficit in half over the next five years. But even Bruce Bartlett, a longtime tax-cut advocate, points out that "projections showing deficits falling assume that Bush's tax cuts expire on schedule." But Mr. Bush wants those tax cuts made permanent. That is, the administration has a "plan" to reduce the deficit that depends on Congress's not passing its own legislation.

Can you believe this? Of course you can.

After all, when Bush was Governor in Texas, he fought the Texas Patient Bill of Rights, let it become law without signing it in protest, and then used it as a campaign prop in 2000.

Bush also threatened to veto the $87 billion before he signed it into law.

There is no good thing that Bush isn't willing to assume credit for, and there's no bad thing that Bush is willing to accept responsibility for. America can do better.

FactCheck.org Is Treating Killian Memos As Authentic

FactCheck.org

UPDATE: Also, someone emailed Jonas Goldberg his memories of a proportional IBM typewriter circa 1971-1974 at Patrick AFB. Nobody wanted to use it because backspacing required a "en" chart.

Which would make it the perfect typewriter for Killian to dash off memos to himself about various subjects.

And CYA has been a military slang term since the '50s.

SECOND UPDATE: The Washington Post has the forgery story on the front page. Someone at CBS spilled on the source who authenticated the content of the memos: Major General Bobby Hodges, who's named in the memos.

Are the Killian Memos Forged?

It looks like it.

The memos are typed using a proportional font. Such a font was not available to ordinary consumers, and unless we want to believe Killian had a souped up typewriter in a National Guard facility, we have to put these memos aside.

A proportional font is like the one you should be looking at right now. It's different from a monospace font, in which each letter, from "i" to "w" occupies exactly the same space on the page. Proportional fonts use less space for i's and l's and more space for w's and m's.

One of the messages refers to the 187th in Montgomery. The "th" is quite small and takes up half the space of the line. Microsoft Word does this when "th" follows a number. There's no way to do this on a 1973 typewriter.

The signatures don't match Killian's signature on Bush's Guard records.

There's some question about the size of the paper, but that's explainable. Unfortunately, these other things are not.

Especially when I used my copy of Microsoft Word to type one of the messages and made an almost exact copy.

What we are looking at, my fellow Democrats, is a master stroke from Karl Rove. These papers are so obviously forgeries that they discredit (once again) the entire AWOL search. They were intended to be so easily revealed.

Making anybody who relied upon them issue retractions and flee from this subject. Damn it, we've been had.

UPDATE: I've been advised to not give up the ship in comments (thanks, Jo). Proportional font typewriters with superscripted "th" were available in the early 1970s. So I'm holding off judgment on the memos.

And they came from Killian's file, not Bush's. Some other memos from his file would help establish this.

Hot Diggity Dog Diggity - Press Notices Missing Guard Files!

Bush's National Guard File Missing Records

What's missing, says the AP?

The five kinds of missing files are:

_A report from the Texas Air National Guard to Bush's local draft board certifying that Bush remained in good standing. The government has released copies of those DD Form 44 documents for Bush for 1971 and earlier years but not for 1972 or 1973. Records from Bush's draft board in Houston do not show his draft status changed after he joined the guard in 1968. The AP obtained the draft board records Aug. 27 under the Freedom of Information Act.

_Records of a required investigation into why Bush lost flight status. When Bush skipped his 1972 physical, regulations required his Texas commanders to "direct an investigation as to why the individual failed to accomplish the medical examination," according to the Air Force manual at the time. An investigative report was supposed to be forwarded "with the command recommendation" to Air Force officials "for final determination."

Bush's spokesmen have said he skipped the exam because he knew he would be doing desk duty in Alabama. But Bush was required to take the physical by the end of July 1972, more than a month before he won final approval to train in Alabama.

_A written acknowledgment from Bush that he had received the orders grounding him. His Texas commanders were ordered to have Bush sign such a document; but none has been released.

_Reports of formal counseling sessions Bush was required to have after missing more than three training sessions. Bush missed at least five months' worth of National Guard training in 1972. No documents have surfaced indicating Bush was counseled or had written authorization to skip that training or make it up later. Commanders did have broad discretion to allow guardsmen to make up for missed training sessions, said Weaver and Lawrence Korb, Pentagon (news - web sites) personnel chief during the Reagan administration from 1981 to 1985.

"If you missed it, you could make it up," said Korb, who now works for the Center for American Progress, which supports Kerry.

_A signed statement from Bush acknowledging he could be called to active duty if he did not promptly transfer to another guard unit after leaving Texas. The statement was required as part of a Vietnam-era crackdown on no-show guardsmen. Bush was approved in September 1972 to train with the Alabama unit, more than four months after he left Texas.

Let's see if anyone picks up on this...

Chickenhawk Bush Running From Debates?

Bush's camp balks on three debates

BAWK-bawk-bawk-bawk-bawk-bawk-ba-Bawk-BAWK!

The man who took two tours of duty in Vietnam wants to debate every week. The man who tossed away his pilot's license while puking behind an Alabama pine tree is trying to run from one of the debates that have already been planned.

Bush shows us just how easy it is to support the war effort when there's somebody else on the front line. What's the matter, George? You skeered of John Kerry? Ba-Bawk-BAWK!

She Watched Lt. Bush Urinate On A Car Election Night 1972

Salon.com

Get the day pass and read this article.

Linda Allison, the wife of Jimmy Allison, is speaking out about how George W. Bush "worked" on William Blount's 1972 Senate campaign in Alabama. How would she know? Her husband was Blount's campaign manager, George was his deputy, and George stayed at their house.

Did she ever see him in a uniform? Are you kidding? The woman was surprised to learn that the National Guard had anything to do with his life at the time.

I was almost willing to give Georgie the benefit of the doubt after the beginning of October, when his grandfather Prescott died. I thought maybe that was the beginning of his turnaround. Oh, no. Not Dubya. Go get the day pass, read, read.

Two Chickenhawks Sittin' Around Cluckin'

Rush's Interview with President George W. Bush

Josh Marshall quotes from this interview, conducted earlier today, in which Bush tries to explain why he said we can't win the war on terror but meant that we can. Rush tries to help him, but even his golden throat can't unmish Georgie's mash.

Go read it. Yes, Bush is pumping the "87 billion" remark, and Rush is busy helping him cement the lie. Remember, don't be too shocked - this is the Rush Limbaugh show, after all.

Franklin Was Cooperating?

The New York Times

According to the Times, Larry Franklin was cooperating with investigators when he was exposed. And he didn't have much access to Wolfowitz, anyway. And he didn't have any input into policy. He was just a grunt, a bottom feeder, a low level employee. No arrest in the case is imminent, because it's not clear whether Franklin broke the law. Plus, AIPAC says they never got anything, and Israel says the same, and it's all a load of insinuations and falsehoods.

Okay. So the guy who wasn't doing anything wrong when he did it, and didn't do it anyway, was cooperating with investigators as a matter of fact, and now we won't be able to catch the people he was contacting when he wasn't doing anything illegal and neither were they, because they weren't doing anything at all.

Right...

You know, this story sounds incredibly like what happened to the al-Qaeda operative that Pakistan caught in time to be announced by the Bush administration on the day John Kerry accepted the nomination...except that he'd been caught a few weeks earlier, and his exposure sent British officials scrambling to arrest the al-Qaeda cell the operative had been setting up. And now it turns out that Franklin had been cooperating too! Yeah, that's the ticket!

I love this: in the paragraph where "prosecutors have not yet clearly established whether Mr. Franklin broke the law," the very next sentence is:

But the officials said there was evidence that he turned the classified material over to officials at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

So giving people without security clearance classified material is not clearly against the law? I'm not going to pretend that all classified material should be classified - people with power to classify must be tempted to classify personally embarassing information all the time.

But a draft of a presidential directive about policy towards Iran? That sounds like something that should be kept under wraps.

So here's what we're looking at. This is a bunch of smokescreen that the Times repeated, with just enough information to make those paying attention say, "Wait a minute..." What this means is:

A) Franklin was doing just what people higher up in the "food chain" wanted, and can prove it

or

B) this type of information sharing happens all the time between mid-level officials and friendly foreign countries, and Franklin's exposure threatens everybody's payola

Which do I think it is? Since the article floats the idea of Franklin getting off scotfree, the first seems more plausible to me. Time may tell...

Finding Nemo On Ice?

No, it's actually much worse than this. I just saw a commercial for Disney On Ice's latest spectacle, Finding Nemo. The costumes are atrocious, so much so that I can't find a picture of them online yet.

So let me describe them. The Dori costume was actually not so bad, but I won't soon forget Nemo's face jutting out of a ice skater's belly, while the skater's head tried vainly to become a part of a clownfish's dorsal fin. And then the bright orange legs undulating in front of the whole costume... I swear the Coen Brothers put Disney up to this.

I'm predicting a lot of screaming, frightened children.

The "Franklin-Stove" Scandal: The Story So Far...

Juan Cole spells out the scope of the Franklin spy scandal, and uggabugga's got the info in graphical form.

Douglas Feith's office, the Near East/South Asia directorate (NESA), became a lie factory, funneling cherry-picked intelligence into Vice President Cheney's office, via the Pentagon's "Office of Special Plans". Libby "Scooter" Lewis was the contact in Cheney's office. Seymour Hersh labeled the OSP a stovepipe.

In effect, NESA was converted by Douglas Feith and associates into an group dedicated to bringing this nation into war with Iraq.

Now we know that Larry Franklin, a desk officer in NESA, is an Israeli spy, who recently slipped a classified draft directive about US policy toward Iran to a pro-Israeli lobbying group, which gave it to Israel. Larry Franklin is, by the way, a former attache at the US embassy in Israel.

We also know that Franklin and Harold Rhode met several times with Iranians who are seeking to overthrow the Iranian government in Rome. The Italian intelligence agency SISMI attended these meetings.

SIMSI has proven to be the organization that distributed accounts of, copies of, and finally the actual forgeries themselves. The documents are ostensibly about Iraq's attempt to buy yellowcake uranium from Niger, but they implicate Iran as well in an unlikely Iraq-Iran alliance.

SIMSI used these documents to create a lot of sympathetic noise among European intelligence agencies about a Iraq-Niger uranium discussion, then slipped the documents to the USA. When Joseph Wilson went public with his damning trip that confirmed no such discussions had happened, his wife, a deep cover CIA operative, was burned by Vice President Cheney's office - and it appears certain that Scooter Lewis, the stovepipe's contact person in Cheney's office, will be implicated in this felony.

So let's get this straight: the Bush Administration was hoodwinked into using the US military as unpaid agents of Israel's foreign policy. They were blind to a spy in the Department of Defense, because that spy was telling them what they wanted to hear. When their bypass of intelligence protocols may have been exposed, they elected to damage our intelligence gathering capability even further, committing a felony in the process.

And they did all of this while enjoying the approval ratings given to Bush after 9/11.

America can do better.

Feel the Tectonic Plates A-Rumblin...

CBS News | FBI Probes Pentagon Spy Case | August 27, 2004 22:15:19

News has leaked of a FBI investigation into an alleged Israeli spy inside the office of the Secretary of Defense. This person had ties to Wolfowitz and Feith, and was assigned to a "unit within the Defense Department tasked with helping develop the Pentagon's Iraq policy." The official now works in Feith's office, where the stovepipe originated.

This person appears to almost certainly be a Harold Rhode, a longtime Pentagon staffer who was recently a liason between the Defense Department and Ahmed Chalabi. The evidence? The New York Times says it was one of two who met with Manucher Ghorbanifar in Paris, and Atrios links to a MSNBC article which gives the names Harold Rhode and Larry Franklin who met Ghorbanifar in Rome, but only Rhode went to Paris.

Now Josh Marshall said on MSNBC that this was about the forged Niger documents. I'm staggered by the implications here. Do you need me to spell this out?

Remember, Saddam was helping to sponsor suicide bombers in Israel. Israel would have a huge motivation for wanting America to invade Iraq. And there's a agent of theirs working in the one office where intelligence information is being shuttled to the White House outside of the normal vetting process. He couldn't get the forged documents there on his own, yet he knew the kind of information that the White House wanted to see.

Seymour Hersch has suggested from his legwork that the documents were forged in an attempt to sting the stovepipe. But it's clear that the documents then took a life of their own, setting up a lot of sympathetic reports in various European intelligence agencies before finally getting (back) into American hands. Perhaps Israel didn't forge the documents themselves, but knew they were coming, and knew how to play the ace they'd been given.

The story by itself is going to strain US-Israeli ties. If what I've speculated turns out to be true, things are going to be really bad quickly. This is not going to be pretty.

UPDATE: People over at DU and other places have the spy pegged as Larry Franklin. I can't say I disagree with them.

Josh Marshall finally has his big story coming out in the Washington Monthly soon. He says this is going to be an Iranian story in the end. It's a big complex story with a lot of players, no doubt.

Ben Barnes: I Got George Bush Into The National Guard

Video File from TPM

Ben Barnes, then Lt. Governor of Texas, got George Bush into the National Guard. I'm reprinting the transcript completely:

Let’s talk a minute about John Kerry and George Bush and I know them both. And I’m not name dropping to say I know ‘em both. I got a young man named George W. Bush in the National Guard when I was Lt. Gov. of Texas and I’m not necessarily proud of that. But I did it. And I got a lot of other people into the National Guard because I thought that was what people should do, when you're in office you helped a lot of rich people. And I walked through the Vietnam Memorial the other day and I looked at the names of the people that died in Vietnam and I became more ashamed of myself than I have ever been because it was the worst thing that I did was that I helped a lot of wealthy supporters and a lot of people who had family names of importance get into the National Guard and I’m very sorry about that and I’m very ashamed and I apologize to you as voters of Texas.

This is being picked up by Knight Ridder. Something tells me that Bush is going to be very sorry about throwing the dice on the Smear Boat campaign.

New MoveOn PAC Ads

MoveOn PAC

Yes, a PAC is different from a 527. Go see the ads - they are Republicans who voted for Bush in 2000 who are voting for Kerry this year. Outstanding.

US Olympic Committee Asks Bush To Pull Ad

SI.com

Bush's political tie-in ad using the Olympics is illegal:

An act of Congress, last revised in 1999, grants the USOC exclusive rights to such terms as "Olympic," derivatives such as "Olympiad" and the five interlocking rings. It also specifically says the organization "shall be nonpolitical and may not promote the candidacy of an individual seeking public office."

Mr. Bush, we understand that while the nation was dealing with the "President above the law" nonsense in 1973, you were busy skipping out on your National Guard duty for whatever reason. However, ignorance of the law is not an excuse for breaking it. Pull the ad.

It All Depends On What Your Definition of "In" Is

Tennessean.com - AP

John O'Neill says that when he said he was "in" Cambodia, he only meant "on the border of," or "always 100 yards away from."

Which means he either lied to a sitting President or he's lying to us.

How Dumb Are The Illinois Republicans? This Dumb.

Jesus' General

The Illinois Republicans put Jack Ryan up against Barack Obama for the Senate. Ryan had to step down when it was revealed that he took his wife (Jeri Ryan of Star Trek: Voyager fame) to sex clubs in order to obtain audiences for their conjugation.

Then they put Alan Keyes up for the contest, who's nothing more than a laughingstock.

Then a blogger called JC Christian wrote one of the prominent Republicans in the state in his spoof mode. JC Christian pretends to be a general who's very manly and not at all hetrosexually challenged, not even when perusing his extensive collection of gladiator movies at length. He's also quite the Republican, and so the good General gave the Republican quite a tonguelashing. He suggested getting rid of Keyes and recruiting Ted Nugent. How did he suggest getting rid of Keyes? Like this:

No time for private investigators. You have to do it yourselves--you broke it; you fix it. I'm thinking of a three way at a Cubs game. As for staging, the photos would look best with Sen. Syverson taking him from behind and Sen. Rauschenberger going down on him, but I guess that part is really up to you.

Well, Senator Syverson responded to the letter. Not in contempt, but as if the General had actually raised some points, which the good Senator hastened to clarify. He even suggested that if the General had floated his name, the search committee would have talked to him.

This may go down as the best prank letter in history. The General has already volunteered to run in Illinois and promises to use his extensive contacts (readership) to gain the funds necessary. If this numbskull responds back, I'm going to volunteer to raise funds in Tennessee.

al-Sistani Urges Peaceful March on Najaf

CNN.com

This would provide a perfect cover for al-Sadr's escape. It would flood the holy city with non-combatants, forcing a ceasefire.

It would, however, end the specter of the "abomination of desolation" that the Gospels spoke of. I'm not subscribing to any theory of Christian endtimes here, but only pointing out a useful paradigm. The Gospels report that Jesus warned about an "abomination of desolation" which would signal Christians to leave the holy city of Jerusalem. This is best identified with Jewish militants taking over the Temple complex in 70 CE. Rome had already surrounded the city - they allowed people to leave if they wished. Then they obliterated Herod's Temple.

The same flag should be a signal to us today. When militant religious fanatics take over a holy shrine, things are going to get ugly really quick. America doesn't have the option of the Roman solution here (and such a solution should be forsworn anyway). This may be the only way of getting al-Sadr out of the mosque without igniting a devestating civil war, although letting him get away only puts the al-Sadr problem on the back burner again. Better simmering on the back burner than boiling over on the front, for now.

And I shudder to think what might happen if Palestinian militants ever seized control of the Dome of the Rock. That's the best reason to establish a self-sufficient colony on Mars that I know of.

Bush Campaign Drafted Patterson Letter

Was just watching CNN. Jerry Patterson, the Texas Land Commissioner, is trying to deliver a letter to Senator Max Cleland, in which he and other vets are saying that the Kerry campaign "can't have it both ways."

This letter, by Patterson's explicit testimony, was drafted by the Bush Campaign for the vets to sign. I don't know the contents of it yet, and it may amount to nothing, but I wanted to make a record of it.

The chicanery continues. The standard that 527s should be held accountable to is one of truth. If a 527 lies and distorts the truth, they should be held accountable. The Smear Boat campaign is a primary example of this. 527s are not the problem - the problem is lies being given a veneer of credibility.

Also, Patterson repeated the idiocy that Bush thought he was getting rid of 527s when he signed McCain-Feingold. Is Bush really trying to claim that he didn't know what he was signing? Did he really think that he was closing that loophole? Is he that much of a chump?

UPDATE: Okay, got some background from CNN. Max Cleland today attempted to deliver a letter to President Bush in Crawford, in which he and other vets plead with Bush to specifically denounce the Smear Boat ads because of content. Evidently, not only were they rebuffed, but someone in the Bush campaign got together a few vets of their own to deliver a letter to Cleland. Patterson is trying to deliver that letter to Cleland.

The Kerry campaign will and has denounced ads from 527s that expressed objectionable content. Bush refuses to denounce specific ads, holding out to completely neuter 527s. The President wonders how much clearer he has to be, because he states that Kerry served honorably. This would help your clarity level, Mr. Bush; say this - "I denounce the Swift Boat Veterans ads that smear John Kerry's honorable service record."

If you want to go on and say, "Any ad from any organization that doesn't tell the truth is something we need to regulate in this country," then go right ahead. But don't have your attack dogs piss on John Kerry's legs and tell us it's raining. Your inability to denounce these specific ads is transparent.

Sidenote: Patterson hasn't spoken to Bush since the last campaign (2000). Evidently, Bush called him personally to thank him for agreeing to deliver the letter and asked about his newborn twins, something at which Patterson expressed mild surprise. How's that for legwork from the Bush campaign? That's the way Rove likes it.

Compare The Military Records of John Kerry and George Bush Yourself

AWOLBush.com

An invaluable service from Marty Heldt: all the links to the publicly available military service documents from both presidential candidates, all on one page.

Just look at that page - which of these men deserves contempt for his service and which praise? It's not even close. Shame on the Smear Boat Vets.

Bush's Nominee to CIA Backed Massive Intelligence Budget Slashes

Washingtonpost.com

Porter Goss, Bush's handpicked successor to George Tenet, would have cut intelligence personnel by 20% between 1996 and 2000.

Bush is slamming John Kerry for advocating cuts in the intelligence budget, but the proposals co-sponsored by Goss would have slashed the budget even further. So according to Bush's rhetoric, his own people are being even more irresponsible with the nation's intelligence gathering than Kerry.

This is nonsense, of course, and undercuts Bush's criticism of Kerry. It's not irresponsible to look for ways to cut the budget. It's not irresponsible to find a more efficient and cheaper way of getting the job done.

And it would seem that lying about Kerry's record is the most efficient way Bush has of campaigning this year.

Bush Criticizes Anti-Kerry Television Ad? Not Hardly

Tennessean.com

What Bush did is what Bush has consistently done since the ad began to air: change the subject to getting rid of 527s altogether.

He's criticizing the ad because it comes from a 527, not because the ad is flagrantly biased and full of lies. That's an important distinction that major media outlets could pay attention to, yet they didn't.

Meanwhile, his campaign supporters continue to use rhetoric designed to take full advantage of the smear campaign. Mark Racicot talked about Kerry being "wild-eyed" about these ads, and wondered about the "steady hand on the ship of state," a clear allusion to the Swiftboat campaign.

Karl Rove knows that Democratic-aligned 527s have raised far more money than Republican ones. The Smear Boat campaign has allowed them to plug the issue of banning 527s, something that can only hurt Kerry, not Bush.

Without the coverfire of 527s, Kerry would be forced to spend his campaign funds to defend himself, while Bush continues to raise money on his protracted "primary" season. At the close of the Republican national convention, Bush will get his $75 million from public funding, while Kerry's campaign resources are drained away fighting these lies. That's what all of this is really about. Bush doesn't care for the subject of Kerry's war record at all, but weakening Kerry's campaign chest to outspend him from September through November? That's the real pie Bush is angling for.

The President has been called upon time and again to condemn these ads based on their content, not their organization's exempt status. To date, he has refused to do so, out of sheer political ambition. The President ought to be ashamed.

Bush's Moral Cowardice

Talking Points Memo

Josh hits it right on the head: George Bush's moral cowardice is the core principle of his life and his presidency. This is a must read.

Did Kerry Violate UCMJ In 1971?

A new meme is taking hold in the world of Bush blogs. It's being fueled by Instapundit, but I found out about it over at Baldilocks, the blog of an ex-Air Force reservist who's been very critical of the AWOL Bush "thing", as she puts it.

Here's the scoop: In 1971, John Kerry met with North Vietnamese officials, something he reported to a Congressional committee. At the time of the meeting, he was in the Naval Reserves (his service continued until 1978). Was this a punishable offense under UCMJ, namely, meeting with the enemy?

According to the UCMJ, members of a reserve component are under the UCMJ's jurisdiction only when attending inactive-duty training. The UCMJ doesn't apply, then. It doesn't make this meeting a wise thing to do, but it wasn't illegal, and it certainly wasn't giving aid and comfort to the enemy.

I linked to Baldilock's initial post, but you can follow through to the next post where she says she was wrong. But then she updates that post to say she was wrong about being wrong. I think she'll get it right soon, though. She's hung up right now on a distinction between regular Reserves and Standby Reserves.

From what I gather, it's harder to call Standby Reserves into active duty. Congress has to have declared war before Standbys are called. Regular reservists can be flipped into active duty on the President's go-ahead. Kerry transferred from active duty to the Reserves as an inactive member (he was planning on running for Congress). Two and a half years later, he transferred to Standby Reserves when his regular Reserve time expired, where he stayed for six years. In both classifications, Kerry was an inactive member.

So another smear about Kerry's service is proven to be untrue. I guess that surprises no one on this side of the aisle...

Bush to Blame Democratic Party for Protestors in New York

NY Times

Absolutely ludicrous, of course. Anybody defending the Democratic Party on talk shows should pop up a picture of the Miami-Dade protestors with their names and connections to prominent Republican congresspeople. They should then tell Sean Hannity to get a similar picture from New York or stuff it.